A PIL under Article 226 was dismissed as not maintainable or presenting no substantial question. The petitioner sought agrarian land law applicability under the U.P. Panchayats Act based on a prior judgment.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:28279
Court No. - 19
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 307 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rama Shankar Alias Rama Shanker Dubey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, U.P. Lucknow And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
सिሺबिሺधि रम चदयके गयके ्ቚत्ययाविकेदनोሸ पर चविधधिनमुसयार उचचिर चनणቔኋय ल क ेर ययाचचिकयाकरयाቔኋ कमो सभूचचिर चकयया जयाय।
Order Date :- 8.4.2024/Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant the agrarian land law applicable to the petitioner based on the older Yashodhar judgment.
Rama Shankar Alias Rama Shanker Dubey
State Of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
