The court dismissed a writ petition challenging mutation proceedings based on an unregistered will, holding that mutation is only for revenue entry. Relied on Supreme Court precedent stating beneficiaries must file a separate suit to crystallize rights. Petitioner left at liberty to pursue alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:167084
Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2494 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt Ram Kumari Respondent :- State Of Up And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushlendra Singh,Rashmi Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Anand Prakash Paul,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Order Date :- 21.10.2024
N. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether mutation proceedings suffice to crystallize rights under an unregistered will, or if a separate suit is mandatory.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jitendra Singh v. State of M.P.Relied on¶7
Jitendra Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others, Special Leave Petition (C) No. 13146 of 2021 decided on 6th September 2021
Smt Ram Kumari
State Of Up And 15 Others
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
