2.9.2024 order listing a petition for mandamus to prevent the petitioner's retirement till a replacement is appointed to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, noting the petitioner had already demitted office. Remitted for exchange of pleadings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6363 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Lko. U.P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Singh Vishen,Nishant Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Heard.
By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to retire the petitioner till the time another judicial member is appointed to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
The petitioner has already demitted office as a member of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on 17.08.2024.
Pleadings be exchanged between the parties within six weeks.
List thereafter .
(Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 2.9.2024 Arnima
Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the State to retain the petitioner in office until another judicial member is appointed to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Rajendra Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Lko. U.P And 3 Others
Rajan Roy
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
