Disposed

Committee of Management Azad Laghu Madhyamik Vidy. Thru. Its ,Manager Smt. Archana v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC12 Jan 2024WRIA/224/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-paragraph order disposing of a writ petition seeking permission to initiate recruitment for Class IV posts. The court directed the respondent to consider a pending application and pass orders expeditiously within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 3 to consider the petitioner's application dated 17.11.2023 and pass orders within six weeks.

Committee of Management Azad Laghu… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:5854

¶2

Court No. - 17

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 224 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Azad Laghu Madhyamik Vidy. Thru. Its ,Manager Smt. Archana Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Krishna Madhav Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1, 2 & 3

¶7

By means of present writ petition the petitioner as sought direction to respondent no. 3 to grant permission to the petitioner to initiate recruitment to the post of clerk and "Paricharak" (Class IV) as per Rules, 1984.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in this regard the State Government issued Government Order dated 15.01.2021, whereby they have declared Class III and Class IV cadre as dying cadre. It is next submitted that the said Government Order was subjected to challenge before this Court in Writ - A No. 5418 of 2019, which writ petition was allowed and the said Government Order was quashed.

¶9

It is next submitted by counsel for the petitioner that there is no legal impediment in granting permission for initiating recruitment, but despite this the respondents have not passed orders on the application of the petitioner.

¶10

It is lastly submitted by counsel for the petitioner that grievance raised by the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent no.3 is directed to consider the application of the petitioner dated 17.11.2023, and pass necessary orders thereupon.

¶11

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the above prayer.

¶12

Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 3 to consider and pass necessary orders on the application of the petitioner dated 17.11.2023,

¶13

expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law.

¶14

Order Date :- 19.1.2024 Satish

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Committee of Management Azad Laghu Madhyamik Vidy. Thru. Its ,Manager Smt. Archana v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Committee of Management Azad Laghu Madhyamik Vidy. Thru. Its ,Manager Smt. Archana v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Arya Samaj,Lucknow Thru. Its Mantri/Secretary Dr. Anjali Tewari and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Finance,Lko. and 3 Others

Mohd. Salman Ansari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Minority Welfare and Waqf Section 3 U.P. Lko. and 4 Others

Kusum Kumari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Kiran Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Urban Development Lko. and 5 Others

Komal Chaurasiya vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/ Prin. Secy., Secondary Education. Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Sarvodaya Bajpai vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Sugar Industry and Cane Development Lko. and 2 Others