Disposed

Manju Yadav @ Manju @ Km Manju v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC19 Jan 2024WRIA/195/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought appointment as Assistant Teacher despite name discrepancies in educational certificates. Court granted liberty to correct certificates before appointment consideration.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to get educational certificates corrected to align with application details before considering appointment issuance.

Manju Yadav @ Manju @ Km Manju vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:13489

¶2

Court No. - 17

¶3

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 195 of 2024

¶4

Petitioner :- Manju Yadav @ Manju @ Km Manju Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others

¶5

Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Prakash Singh,Javed Khan,Neeranjan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Shailendra Singh Rajawat

¶6

Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 & 2, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.3 and Mr. S.S. Rajawat, learned counsel for opposite party no.4.

¶8

Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to issue appointment letter to petitioner for the post of Assistant Teacher ignoring minor differences in her name as recorded in the educational certificates.

¶9

Learned counsel for opposite parties on the basis of instructions however submits that since there is some discrepancy in the application submitted by petitioner with the name indicated in educational certificates, it would be appropriate that petitioner may get her educational certificates corrected whereafter issuance of appointment letter may be considered.

¶10

In view of aforesaid submissions, petitioner is granted liberty to get her educational certificates corrected to bring them in line with the details indicated in the Application Form whereafter the opposite parties are directed to consider issuance of appointment to petitioner in light of such corrections having been made.

¶11

This orders, however shall be subject to final orders passed in

¶12

the Special Leave Petition wherein status quo appears to have been directed with regard to issuance of appointment letters.

¶13

With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 15.2.2024 kvg/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Manju Yadav @ Manju @ Km Manju v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manju Yadav @ Manju @ Km Manju v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Mathur Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Education Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others

Arun Memorial Higher Secondary School, Bahraich Thru. Manager, Laxmi Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Madhyamik Shiksha, Lucknow and Others

Natthu Singh and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. (Ex- Officio ) Chairperson (U.P.S.a.S) Lko. and 4 Others

Km. Jaya Srivastava Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secretary Basic Education and 2 Others

Premlata Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Nagar Vikas U.P. Lko. and 2 Others

Arya Samaj, Lucknow Thru. Secy. Abhishek Tiwari and Another Vs Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and Others