Petitioner argued the writ petition became infructuous due to subsequent developments. Respondents did not dispute this. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:118940
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10197 of 2024
Petitioner :- Anshul Bharti Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Chand Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushlesh Pratap Singh,Shruti Malviya
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Order Date :- 25.7.2024 Swati
Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anshul Bharti
State Of U.P.
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
