An insurance company's appeal from an order under Order 41 Rule 24 CPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as it was listed peremptorily and the appellant was absent.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 811 of 2011
Appellant :- National Insurance Co. Ltd. Having Its Rgistered Office At 3 Respondent :- Kumari Nainsi And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Surendra Pal Singh,Anurodh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Anurodh Kumar Srivastava,J.B. Singh
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
The appeal is listed as peremptorily.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The order has been passed in presence of Shri Anurodh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 3.4.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Kumari Nainsi and 4 Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
