Appeal from defective order dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was absent and made no request for adjournment.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 102 of 2011
Appellant :- Firoz Ahmad @ Sanjay Miyan Respondent :- Union Of India Through Its General Manager Northern Railway Counsel for Appellant :- Madan Mohan Pandey,Y Counsel for Respondent :- Ankit Pande,Raj Kumar Pandey,Ved Prakash
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 2.4.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Firoz Ahmad @ Sanjay Miyan
Union Of India Through Its General Manager Northern Railway
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
