Brief interlocutory order noting insufficient service on a respondent, ordering a reminder for the trial court record, and directing fresh notice to be issued within a week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 223 of 2024
Appellant :- Mamta And 3 Others Respondent :- National Insurance Company Limited Thru. Legal Branch Manager Ayodhya And 4 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Mukesh Singh,Faizal Hashmi Counsel for Respondent :- Shashank Srivastava,Shashank Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
As per office report service of notice on opposite parties no.1, 2, 4 and 5 is sufficient.
Service of notice on opposite party no.3 is not sufficient as the same was received back with the remark 'not met, house was locked.
The trial court record is still awaited.
Office to send the reminder for the Lower Court Record.
Issue fresh notice to opposite party no.3.
Steps to be taken within a week.
List with service report.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Mamta And 3 Others
National Insurance Company Limited Thru. Legal Branch Manager Ayodhya And 4 Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
