Appellant, not pressing appeal on merits, sought direction for expeditious bail consideration upon surrender. Court disposed of the appeal with such a direction, citing Satender Kumar Antil, and prohibited coercive action for one month.
Appeal disposed of; direction to consider bail expeditiously upon surrender; no coercive action for one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:136723
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4942 of 2024 Appellant :- Ruchin Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Dr. Kamlesh Kumar,Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 27.8.2024/Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's criminal appeal should be disposed of with a direction for expeditious bail consideration upon surrender.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on¶7
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ruchin
State of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
