Disposed

Pushpendra @ Dhiru and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Aug 2024CRLA/3750/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against a summoning order under the SC/ST Act was disposed of without pressing merits. The court directed that if appellants surrender within one month and apply for bail, it shall be decided expeditiously; no coercive action is permitted in the interim.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed; direction for expeditious bail consideration if appellants surrender within one month; no coercive action allowed.

Pushpendra @ Dhiru and Another vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:130810

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3750 of 2024

¶4

Appellant :- Pushpendra @ Dhiru And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- B.N.Singh,G.A.,Manish Kumar Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for parties.

¶7

This criminal appeal under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'SC/ST Act') has been preferred against the summoning order dated 31.01.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2/Special Judge, SC/ST (PA) Act, Kanpur Dehat in Session Case No.204 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 163 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C and Section 3(1)Da of SC/ST Act, P.S. Sadh, District- Kanpur (Outer).

¶8

At the very outset, learned counsel for appellants submitted that he is not pressing the appeal on merits and confined his prayer only to the extent that the present appeal may be disposed of finally with a direction to the court concerned that in case appellants surrender before it and apply for bail, their bail applications may be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, including the law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) to which learned counsel for opposite parties have no objection.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, the instant criminal appeal is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the appellants surrender before the court concerned within a period of one month from today and apply for bail, their bail applications shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.

¶10

However, it is made clear that till one month from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the appellants herein.

¶11

Order Date :- 12.8.2024 Vikram

¶12

Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pushpendra @ Dhiru and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpendra @ Dhiru and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devendra Pandey @ Devendra Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Vikram Vishwakarma vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Nagina Ojha and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Jitendra Narayan and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Babban Sahu vs State of Up and 3 Others

Ruchin vs State of U.P. and Another