Contempt application alleging noncompliance of a 2022 Section 482 order against a Judicial Officer; the Court found no wilful disobedience and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:183413
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7287 of 2024
Applicant :- Raj Kumar Ravat Opposite Party :- Shri Narendra Nath Pandey, Additional District And Session Judge Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kukmar Tiwari
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard the counsel for the applicant.
The present contempt application has been filed pleading noncompliance of the order dated 23.9.2022 passed by this Court in Application U/S 482 No. 21150 of 2022.
From the records annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application, I do not find any wilful disobedience on the part of the Judicial Officer of the court concerned who has been impleaded as opposite party in the present case.
The contempt application is dismissed .
Order Date :- 23.11.2024 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raj Kumar Ravat
Shri Narendra Nath Pandey, Additional District And Session Judge
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
