Contempt application filed for non-compliance of a previous order. The court found no evidence of wilful disobedience by the impleaded judicial officer and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:182413
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 7110 of 2024
Applicant :- Raja Ram Upadhyay Opposite Party :- Amit Yadav Presiding Officer Counsel for Applicant :- Akshara Rai,Sujeet Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard the counsel for the applicant.
The present contempt application has been filed pleading noncompliance of the order dated 8.11.2023 passed by this Court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 11396 of 2023.
From the records annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application, I do not find any wilful disobedience on the part of the Judicial Officer of the court concerned who has been impleaded as opposite party in the present case.
The contempt application is dismissed .
Order Date :- 22.11.2024 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was wilful disobedience of the order dated 8.11.2023 by the Judicial Officer?
Raja Ram Upadhyay
Amit Yadav
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
