Contempt application alleging non-compliance of a prior order; no one appeared for the applicant, and the court found no wilful disobedience by the Presiding Officer impleaded as opposite party, dismissing the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:131976
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5018 of 2024
Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Opposite Party :- Shri Sumit Singh Counsel for Applicant :- A.P. Singh,Ram Singh
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears for the applicant.
The present contempt application has been filed pleading noncompliance of the order dated 1.4.2024 passed by this Court in Contempt Application (Civil) No. 1716 of 2024.
From the records annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the contempt application, I do not find any wilful disobedience on the part of the Presiding Officer of the court concerned who has been impleaded as opposite party in the present case.
The contempt application is dismissed .
Order Date :- 14.8.2024 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the opposite party wilfully disobeyed the order dated 1.4.2024 passed in Contempt Application (Civil) No. 1716 of 2024?
Rakesh Kumar
Shri Sumit Singh
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
