Bhoop Singh Yadav and 9 Others v. Shri Sanjay Singh Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
The court issued notices to the respondent to show cause for wilfully defying an order dated 29.5.2024 in the underlying writ petition, returnable within two weeks.
What did the court decide?
Notice issued to the opposite party to show cause for wilful disobedience of the directions of this Court.
What the court decided
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3507 of 2024
Applicant :- Bhoop Singh Yadav And 9 Others Opposite Party :- Shri Sanjay Singh Managing Director Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Dwivedi,Mahendra Pratap Singh
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order of this Court dated 29.5.2024 passed in Writ A No. 4129 of 2024 (Bhoop Singh Yadav Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.) has been willfully defied by the respondents.
- Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the description of respondent forthwith.
- Let notices be issued to the opposite party within a week to show cause as to why he should not be punished for wilful disobedience of the directions of this Court, returnable within two weeks failing which the charges may be framed after summoning the contemnors.
- Office is directed to send a copy of this order along with the notice.
- Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to provide copy of the contempt application to learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notices should be issued to the respondent to show cause for wilful disobedience of the court's directions.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bhoop Singh Yadav And 9 Others
- respondent
Shri Sanjay Singh Managing Director
Coram
Gaurav Pal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CAPL/3507/2024
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Barkha Gupta vs Sri Surendra Tiwari, Secy. U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj and Another
Jagdish vs Ms. Aakriti Srivastava Tehsildar Sarojini Nagar Lucknow
Juvenile a, Thru. Guardian/Father vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another
Dr. Ghanshyam Lal vs Dr. Hariom, Janjati Vikas Directorate, Lko.