The Court allowed the impleadment application of the applicant. Notice was issued to the newly impleaded respondent to show cause why they should not be punished for wilful disobedience of the Court's directions.
Impleadment application allowed; notice issued to respondent to show cause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2100 of 2024
Applicant :- Hari Shankar Shukla Opposite Party :- Sri, Ram Achal Kuril, Executive Officer Nagar Palika Parisad Pratapgarh Counsel for Applicant :- Anup Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
(Order on Impleadment Application i.e. I.A./01/2024)
(Order on Contempt Application)
Order Date :- 21.8.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be impleaded in the contempt proceedings?
Whether the respondent should be summoned for wilful disobedience of court directions?
Hari Shankar Shukla
Sri Ram Achal Kuril
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
