Allowed

Vivek Tripathi v. State of U.P Thru.Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Allahabad HC4 Apr 2024BAIL/3759/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application seeking enlargement from remand custody. Relieving concerns over similar FIRs, the court granted bail by regular bond.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 20,000/- each, to be executed by him to attend hearings, not commit any offence similar to the one accused of,

Vivek Tripathi vs State of U.P Thru.Prin. Secy. Home Civil… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:37689

¶2

Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3759 of 2024 Applicant :- Vivek Tripathi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru.Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arunendra Mohan Shukla,GA,Rajesh Kumar

¶3

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶4

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶5

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.202 of 2023, under Section 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120B IPC, P.S. Vikas Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶6

3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that with regard to the allegations contained in the FIR, similar FIRs were filed and the applicant was enlarged on bail in as many as 33 cases; details whereof are on record as Annexure - 2.

¶7

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶8

5. Considering the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the other cases where the applicant has been granted bail, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail in the present case also, more so, when the applicant is in custody since 17.07.2016 and is on remand in the present case since 01.12.2023. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶9

6. Let the applicant Vivek Tripathi be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶11

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶12

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

Order Date :- 16.5.2024 nishant

¶14

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vivek Tripathi v. State of U.P Thru.Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Tripathi v. State of U.P Thru.Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P., Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Rajkumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko.

Harshit @ Sheru Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Govt. of U.P., Lko.

Atul vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others

Rahul Rawat Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others

Taufeeq Khan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home