Allowed

Taufeeq Khan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home

Allahabad HC4 Apr 2024BAIL/3768/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application granted in a FIR under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, considering the applicant's prior bail status in related cases.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a personal bond of two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each and conditions to attend hearings, avoid similar offences, and not tamper with evidence.

Taufeeq Khan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27735

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3768 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Taufeeq Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Counsel for Applicant :- Pratul Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.132 of 2024, under Section 2(b)(xvii)/ 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Kheri, District Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶8

3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart. The copies of the bail orders are on record.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Taufeeq Khan be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 4.4.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Taufeeq Khan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taufeeq Khan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P., Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Rajkumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko.

Harshit @ Sheru Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Govt. of U.P., Lko.

Atul vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others

Rahul Rawat Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Others

Vivek Tripathi vs State of U.P Thru.Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.