High Court at Lucknow allowed bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving allegations under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC and DV Act, citing non-cooperation by prosecution and applicant's clean record.
Released on bail with personal bond and two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27441
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2043 of 2024
Applicant :- Harshit @ Sheru Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Govt. Of U.P., Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Aman Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
trial, coupled with the fact that applicant has no criminal history, and the assertion made in Paragaraph-17 has not been controverted, the applicant, who is in custody since 08.05.2023, is enlarged on bail. Thus the bail application is allowed .
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 3.4.2024 KR
Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant given the lack of prosecution cooperation and his clean criminal record.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harshit @ Sheru
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
Rabindra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
