Adjournment order in a defective Section 37 arbitration appeal; a substitute advocate announced appearance following the counsel's death, and listing was deferred by two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 71 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highway Authority Of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow Respondent :- Ashok Kumar And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Vimlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Vijay Kumar Tewari
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri Harish Chandra Tripathi, Advocate submits that on account of death of Shri Vijay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent he will appear and file his 'Vakalatnama' alongwith objection.
List after two weeks.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
National Highway Authority of India thru Project Director PIU Lucknow
Ashok Kumar
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
