The court dismissed a defective second appeal for non-prosecution. Service of notice was deemed sufficient for some respondents, while another was reported dead and another failed to appear. No fresh appearance was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 117 of 2011
Appellant :- Kidar S/O Babu And Ors. Respondent :- Smt. Ramwati W/O Late Vishal And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Ravi Nath Tilhari Counsel for Respondent :- Angrej Nath Shukla
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Card notice was issued to the appellants to engage another counsel on account of elevation of learned counsel for the appellants to the Bench.
As per office report,service of notice is deemed sufficient upon respondent no.2 and sufficient upon respondent no.3. Appellant no. 1 is reported dead. However, neither anybody has put in appearance on behalf the respondent nos.2 and 3 nor any application for substitution has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.1.
Dismissed accordingly and for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 26.11.2024 Akanksha Sri.
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kidar S/O Babu And Ors.
Smt. Ramwati W/O Late Vishal And Ors.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
