National Highway Authority of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow v. Sitaram and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 45 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highway Authority Of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow Respondent :- Sitaram And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Ms.Sandhya Somvanshi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks further time to file supplementary affidavit in terms of order dated 19.02.2024.
List thereafter.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
National Highway Authority Of India
- respondent
Sitaram And Anr.
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- ARPLD/45/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Rajnish Kumar
- Order 2 — this page · Rajnish Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court