Procedural order in an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The court noted a defective vakalatnama filed by the respondent's counsel was not on record and directed the office to trace and place it on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 4 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highways Authority Of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow Respondent :- Uma Shyam And Anr. Counsel for Appellant :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- Vijay Kumar Tewari,C.S.C.,Harish Chandra Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Harish Chandra Tripathi,Advocate submits that he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the claimant- respondent on 14.12.2024. The same is not on record.
Office is directed to trace out the same and place it on record, after removal of defect, if any.
List again.
Order Date :- 17.12.2024 Akanksha Sri.
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
National Highways Authority Of India
Uma Shyam And Anr.
Rajnish Kumar
Akanksha Sri
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
