Disposed

Govind v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Nov 2024ABAIL/9440/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as withdrawn by the applicant. The court directed the applicant to surrender within one month and file a regular bail application to be decided in light of the Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; applicant directed to surrender within one month and file a regular bail application.

Govind vs State of U.P. — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:183066

¶2

Court No. - 65

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9440 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Govind Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Priyanka Bharati,Sudhir Kumar Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 231 of 2024, under Section 60 Excise Act and Section 272 IPC, Police Station- Gulriha, District- Gorakhpur.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 22.11.2024 Priya

¶14

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Govind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt Ashi vs State of Up

Shubhankar Arya and Another vs State of U.P.

Dileep Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Babu Khan vs State of U.P. and Another

Seema Devi vs State of U.P. and Another

Ali Ahmad @ Pappu and Another vs State of Up