Disposed

Ali Ahmad @ Pappu and Another v. State of Up

Allahabad HC22 Nov 2024ABAIL/10718/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a cow slaughter and Arms Act case was withdrawn by counsel and disposed of with a direction to surrender within one month; no coercive action till surrender, regular bail to be decided per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection from coercive action for one month or till surrender, whichever is earlier; direction to decide regular bail per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

Ali Ahmad @ Pappu and Another vs State of Up — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:182541

¶2

Court No. - 65

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10718 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Ali Ahmad @ Pappu And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunita Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Ms. Sunita Chauhan, learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.84 of 2024, under Sections 3/5A/8 U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and 4/25 Arms Act, P.S. Mehnagar, District Azamgarh.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Ali Ahmad @ Pappu and Muhammad Arif, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 22.11.2024 Ravi/-

¶14

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ali Ahmad @ Pappu and Another v. State of Up

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ali Ahmad @ Pappu and Another v. State of Up

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Ashi vs State of Up

Shubhankar Arya and Another vs State of U.P.

Dileep Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Babu Khan vs State of U.P. and Another

Seema Devi vs State of U.P. and Another

Govind vs State of U.P.