Disposed

Dileep Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Nov 2024ABAIL/10974/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in a 2015 FIR alleging cheating and forgery offences. Counsel withdrew the application seeking regular bail instead; the court disposed of it, directing surrender within one month, protection from coercive action meanwhile, and decision of any regular bail per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

What did the court decide?

One-month window to surrender; interim protection from coercive action; direction that regular bail be decided per Satender Kumar Antil.

Dileep Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:181434

¶2

Court No. - 65

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10974 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Dileep Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Mishra,Krishna Kant Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 10 of 2015, under Sections 419, 420, 409, 120B, 467, 468 I.P.C., P.S.- Mo. Painsa, District- Kaushambi.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 21.11.2024 Shalini

¶14

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dileep Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dileep Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sunil vs State of Up and Another

Rahul vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Pappu vs State of U.P.

Rinkoo Rana Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sumit Jaisawal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Vichitra Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.