Prakash @ Chunni v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application listed; none appeared for the applicant to press it. The State was represented. Matter directed to be listed in ordinary course.
Anticipatory bail application listed; none appeared for the applicant to press it. The State was represented. Matter directed to be listed in ordinary course.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8083 of 2024
Applicant :- Prakash @ Chunni Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Singh,Sheelendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 26.11.2024 Aditya
Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash @ Chunni
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court