Dismissed¶8

Prakash @ Chunni v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Sept 2025ABAIL/8083/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application; S. 438 Cr.P.C.; dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated; none appeared for applicant; Prakash @ Chunni v. State of U.P.; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Court No. 70; Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.; September 23, 2025; Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application No. 8083 of 2024.

What did the court decide?

The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶8

Prakash @ Chunni Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8083 of 2024

¶2

Prakash @ Chunni

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

		Versus
State of U.P.					.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Sanjay Kumar	Kumar	Singh,	Sheelendra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.
Court No.- 70

¶5

HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

¶6

List revised. None is present for the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

¶8

In view of above, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶9

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

¶10

Office is directed to communicate this order to the court concerned.

¶11

(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)

¶12

September 23, 2025

¶13

Mustaqeem.

¶14

Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Prakash @ Chunni v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash @ Chunni v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases