Nazma Begum v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.; counsel absent and service report awaited, so the hearing was adjourned to a fixed date with instructions for a fresh service report.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7553 of 2024
Applicant :- Nazma Begum Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vipul Shukla,Yaheya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Case called out in the revised list. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
As per office report dated 25.10.2024, service report is awaited.
Place this case on 11.11.2024 amongst top ten cases of the additional cause list. On that date, office shall submit a fresh service report.
Order Date :- 4.11.2024 Sachin Mishra
Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nazma Begum
- other
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/7553/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court