Dismissed

Laljit and 12 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2024A482/28886/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected the application under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings punishable up to seven years imprisonment. The court dismissed the prayer but allowed the applicant liberty to file a regular bail application with an undertaking to decide the same based on specific Supreme Court precedents.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to quash proceedings refused; liberty granted to file regular bail application.

Laljit and 12 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:162509

¶2

Court No. - 78

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28886 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Laljit And 12 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Darwari Lal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶6

Sri Darwari Lal, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Tej Bhan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 11339 of 2024, (State Vs. Laljit and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 150 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308, 336, 147, 325 of I.P.C., Police Station- Pawai, District- Azamgarh, as well as cognizance/ summoning order 29.06.2024 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 26, Azamgarh.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment.

¶9

Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused.

¶10

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶11

In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941.

¶12

The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

¶13

Order Date :- 4.10.2024 Ishan

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Laljit and 12 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laljit and 12 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Tajuddin and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Kailash vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dhananjay Singh vs State of Up and Another

Ajay Dubey vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohan Singh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajesh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another