Applicant sought quashing of proceedings under Section 482 CrPC for offences punishable up to seven years. Counsel withdrew application with liberty to file bail.
Application disposed of; liberty granted to file regular bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:150264
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29827 of 2024 Applicant :- Rajesh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vipin Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Vipin Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and Ms. Ladly Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 67 of 2023, (State Vs. Rajesh and another) arising out of Case Crime No. 118 of 2023, under Sections 323, 336 and 308 of IPC, Police Station Shamshabad, District Agra, as well as cognizance and summoning order dated 19.10.2023, pending in the Court of CJM, Court No.3, Agra.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offences are punishable up to 7 years imprisonment.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.
In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941.
The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 13.9.2024 Akram
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether valuable and professional life and experience are applicable to sanctions under Section 3 of the Prohibition Law?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & AnotherReferred¶9
(2021) 10 SCC 773, Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another · Who else cites this
Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & AnotherReferred¶9
2022 (11) SCC 676, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another · Who else cites this
Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through DirectorReferred¶9
2021 SCC Online SC 941, Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh And Another
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
