Baijnath Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought quashing under Section 482 CrPC of proceedings under the U.P. Gangsters Act, contending no cogent material attracted section 3. Court granted the State four weeks to take instructions and adjourned the matter for further hearing.
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27699 of 2024
Applicant :- Baijnath Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the basis of two cases, the provisions of Gangsters Act have been invoked against the applicant; there is no cogent material which may attract section 3 of the U.P. Gangsters Act.
- Matter requires consideration.
- Learned A.G.A. prays for and is granted four weeks' time to take instructions in the matter.
- Put up as fresh on 20.2.2025.
Order Date :- 26.11.2024 Anil K. Sharma
Justice Vinod Diwakar
Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Baijnath Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/27699/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court