Disposed

Hariom and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC14 Aug 2024CRLA/3811/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against SC/ST Act cognizance order dismissed. Court permits final disposal with a direction for expeditious bail consideration if appellants surrender within 30 days, barring coercive action during that period.

What did the court decide?

Appeal finally disposed of with a direction to consider bail applications expeditiously if appellants surrender within 30 days; no coercive action permitted till then.

Hariom and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:155250

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3811 of 2024

¶4

Appellant :- Hariom And 2 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Ajay Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for parties.

¶7

This criminal appeal under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'SC/ST Act') has been filed against the cognizance order dated 08.05.2023 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bareilly as well as charge sheet dated 17.07.2022 in Criminal Case no. 1158 of 2023 (State Vs. Hariom and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 166 of 2022 under sections 323, 324, 427, 504, 506 IPC & 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Hafizganj, District Bareilly.

¶8

Learned counsel for appellants submitted that he is not pressing the appeal on merits and confined his prayer only to the extent that the present appeal may be disposed of finally with a direction to the court concerned that in case appellants surrender before it and apply for bail, their bail application may be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, including the law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) to which learned counsel for opposite parties have no objection.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, the instant criminal appeal is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the appellants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.

¶10

However, it is made clear that till 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the appellants herein.

¶11

Order Date :- 23.9.2024

¶12

Shaswat

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hariom and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hariom and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kamla Joshi and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Shivam Kushwaha vs State of Up and Another

Anshu Pal vs State of Up Others

Pankaj Mishra and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Ranjeet Singh vs State of Up and Another

Prempal and Another vs State of U.P. and Another