Criminal appeal against a summoning order in a complaint case involving cheating, criminal breach of trust and rape charges with SC/ST Act provisions. The court did not decide the merits but directed the trial court to conclude proceedings within 12 months and protected the appellant from coercive action meanwhile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:158272
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2705 of 2024
Appellant :- Pradeep Kumar Sahu Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Deepesh Kumar Ojha,Ichhvaku Pratap Shahi
Counsel for Respondent :- Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma,G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, but after giving full opportunity of hearing to both sides.
Order Date :- 24.9.2024 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the summoning order dated 08.01.2024 in Complaint Case no. 41 of 2023 under sections 420, 406, 376 IPC read with 3(2)(va) SC/ST Act be set aside?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pradeep Kumar Sahu
State of U.P.
Urmila
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
