Vikram v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim order on a Section 482 application where parties to an alleged kidnapping offence settled their dispute by compromise and are living as husband and wife. Counsel was directed to file a supplementary affidavit with the certified compromise; proceedings against the applicant were stayed until the next listing date.
What did the court decide?
Further proceedings against the applicant stayed till 20.8.2024.
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24145 of 2024
Applicant :- Vikram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Chandra Solanki Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Sri Shailendra Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate filed vakalatnama as well as short counter affidavit on on behalf of informant, which is taken on record.
Office is directed to print the name of Sri Shailendra Kumar Kushwaha, in the appropriate column of counsel by the next date of listing.
Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that parties settled their dispute arising out of offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 of I.P.C. on the basis of compromise dated 29.5.2024.
Private opposite party no. 2 is father of the victim and the affidavit of present applicant has been sworn by victim of the aforesaid case.
As per compromise, parties are living as husband and wife.
Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to file supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copy of the compromise.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vikram
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2 (father of the victim)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/24145/2024
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court