Satya Prakash and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 482 application based on a compromise between the parties in a case under Sections 323, 324, 325 and 504 IPC. The Court had earlier directed verification of the compromise; as the verification report remained awaited, the hearing was adjourned by three weeks.
What the court decided
Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19973 of 2024
Applicant :- Satya Prakash And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Bhaskar Bhadra,G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
- Heard Mr. Abhishek Singh, the learned counsel for applicants, the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Bhaskar Bhadra, the learned counsel representing first informant-opposite party-2.
- Perused the record.
- Present application came up for admission on 03.07.2024 and this Court passed the following order:-
"1. Learned counsel for both the parties jointly submitted that the parties have settled their dispute arising out of the offence punishable under Sections 324, 325, 323 and 504 I.P.C. vide compromise dated 8.11.2023, a certified copy of which is annexed as Annexure-4 (page no. 39) to the paper-book.
2. Both the parties are directed to appear before the court concerned for verification of the compromise.
3. The applicants are directed to file certified copy of the compromise along with record of verification proceedings by means of a supplementary affidavit by the next date fixed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satya Prakash And 3 Others
- respondent
First Informant (Opposite Party-2)
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/19973/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sanjiv Kumar
- Order 2 · Sanjiv Kumar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court