Disposed

Amber Jetli v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Jul 2024A482/21946/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of criminal proceedings arising from a Ghaziabad case crime with cognizance and summoning order. Prayer was refused; counsel withdrew the application with liberty to file a regular bail application, which was granted.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw and file a regular bail application before competent jurisdiction granted.

Amber Jetli vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:119827

¶2

Court No. - 78

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 21946 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Amber Jetli Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Pratap Singh,Vishal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶6

Sri Rewti Raman Patel, Advocate holding brief Sri Ravindra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashwani Kumar Rai, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 67385 of 2023, (State Vs. Amber Jetli) arising out of Case Crime No. 542 of 2023, under Sections 193, 198 of I.P.C., Police Station- Kavi Nagar, District- Ghaziabad, as well as cognizance/ summoning order 16.10.2023 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant was not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge-sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment.

¶9

Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant is, hereby, refused.

¶10

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶11

In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicant, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941.

¶12

The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

¶13

Order Date :- 26.7.2024 Ishan

¶14

Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amber Jetli v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amber Jetli v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Gupta @ Guddu vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Raghvendra Ratan @ Gannu Pandey and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Aasif @ Bauaa and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Raj Kumar and Others vs State of U.P.

Neerpal Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Gautam Srivastava Alias Gattu vs State of U.P. and Another