Salim and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In a non-appearance reiterated hearing regarding an u/s 482 application, the Court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicants.
In a non-appearance reiterated hearing regarding an u/s 482 application, the Court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:190152
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19080 of 2024
Applicant :- Salim And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ripu Soodan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicants, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 3.12.2024 Akram
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Salim And 5 Others
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Mohammad Akram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court