Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash criminal proceedings was withdrawn by the applicant with liberty to file a bail application. The prayer to quash was refused.
Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:188428
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30556 of 2024
Applicant :- Dayaram And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Bind Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Heard Sri Anil Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 148 of 2024 (State vs. Dayaram and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 796 of 2023, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 325 IPC, P.S. Gurshaiganj, District Kannauj as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 15.02.2024, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kannauj.
Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is hereby refused.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw this application with liberty to file a bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction.
In view of the above, this application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicant to file an appropriate application for bail before the court below in terms of the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 and Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2022(11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director, 2021 SCC Online SC 941 .
Order Date :- 2.12.2024 MAA/-
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings and summoning order should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶10
Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 · Who else cites this
Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar PradeshReferred¶10
Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another, 2022(11) SCC 676 · Who else cites this
Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I.Referred¶10
Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director, 2021 SCC Online SC 941 · Who else cites this
Dayaram And 3 Others
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
