Mukesh Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC by the applicant; hearing adjourned on counsel's request for a first adjournment, with the matter listed afresh on 18.09.2024. No substantive adjudication was made.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18424 of 2024
Applicant :- Mukesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ageet Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,R.P.S. Chauhan
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Vishwanath Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ageet Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for applicant and the learned A.G.A. for State.
On the matter being taken up, a request for adjournment has been prayed on behalf of learned counsel for applicant.
Perused the record.
Adjournment prayed on behalf of learned counsel for applicant is the first adjournment.
In view of above, hearing of present application is adjourned.
Matter shall re-appear, as fresh, on 18.09.2024.
Order Date :- 3.9.2024. Rks.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mukesh Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/18424/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court