Disposed

Naushad v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC1 Oct 2024A482/29336/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in a criminal trial. The applicant challenged an order issuing a non-bailable warrant. The court did not quash the warrant but directed its execution to remain in abeyance for four weeks or until the applicant appears.

What did the court decide?

Execution of non-bailable warrant kept in abeyance for four weeks or until applicant appears.

Naushad vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:160858

¶2

Court No. - 78

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29336 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Naushad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.

¶6

Sri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Tej Bhan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

¶7

The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed to quash the order dated 22.03.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 12, Meerut in Session Trial No. 752 of 2016 (State vs. Anees & others), arising out of Case Crime No. 191 of 2016, under Sections 395, 397, 412 IPC, whereby NBW has been issued against the applicant.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned order has been passed without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served. It is further submitted that non-bailable warrant has been issued without issuing any summon and bailable warrant.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application.

¶11

Considering submissions of learned counsel for the applicants and perusing record, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within four weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through

¶12

Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941 .

¶13

For a period of four weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against applicant shall be kept in abeyance.

¶14

Order Date :- 1.10.2024 MAA/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AZAD ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Naushad v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naushad v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Lal Bahadur Maurya vs State of U.P. and Another

Sahendra and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Sanjay Tripathi vs State of U.P.

Yashpal and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Anil Singh and Another vs State of Up and Another

Mohammad Waseem and Another vs State of U.P. and Another