Gajendra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution after no representation was filed by the applicant on the revised call.
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution after no representation was filed by the applicant on the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16057 of 2024
Applicant :- Gajendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
List of fresh cases has been revised. None is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
However, learned A.G.A. is present.
On 04.10.2024 no one was present on behalf of the applicant to press this application even in the revised call.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 11.11.2024 Ishan
Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajendra Singh
State of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court