Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear in the call list despite summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:167264
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 14975 of 2024
Applicant :- Abhisek Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Even in the revised call, none appears for the applicant, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
On 20.9.2024 also, none was present from the side of applicant in the revised call.
In view of above, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 21.10.2024 A.P. Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abhisek
State Of U.P.
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
Anand Prakash Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
