This petition challenged a citation of proceedings dated 2013 when the underlying decree date was also 2013. The High Court examined if this indicated impropriety or required quashing under its supervisory jurisdiction.
Final order raised digitally; outcome text unavailable due to garbled content.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58360
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3933 of 2024
Petitioner :- Jagdev Maurya
Respondent :- Civil Judge Senior Division Court No. 10 Distt. Raebareli And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubhranshu Verma
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
सभ्रांख्यया 1144 सन 2013 कया चनस्रयारण शश्रीघ् र यापमूविर्ताक, चबनया चकसश्री पकहों कको अनयाविश्यक स्थरन दकेरके हहए चविधधिनशुसयार करनया सशुचनमश्चिर करम।
Order Date :- 28.8.2024 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the citation of a proceeding dated 2013 despite the original decree date being 2013 indicates procedural irregularity under Article 227.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagdev Maurya
Civil Judge Senior Division Court No. 10 Distt. Raebareli
Subhash Vidyarthi
Himanshu Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
