The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, considered a petition under Article 227 challenging summons issued by a Civil Judge in Raebareli. The petition argued procedural impropriety and delay, questioning the lower court's jurisdiction to summon a witness.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58360
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3933 of 2024
Petitioner :- Jagdev Maurya
Respondent :- Civil Judge Senior Division Court No. 10 Distt. Raebareli And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubhranshu Verma
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
सኋ᭟ख्यया 1144 सन 2013 कया चनस्रयारण शቦኍ्ቈरयापमूविቔኋक, चबनया चकसቦኍ पकोሻ कको अनयाविश्यक स्थरन दकेरके हहए चविधधिनशुसयार करनया सशुचनमश्चिर करम।
Order Date :- 28.8.2024 Himanshu
Digitally signed by :- HIMANSHU SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Civil Judge Senior Division Court No. 10 Raebareli exceeded jurisdiction by issuing summons under section 1144 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
Whether the High Court is justified in quashing the summons issued in suits dated 17.12.2021 due to delayed action inconsistent with the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagdev Maurya
Civil Judge Senior Division Court No. 10 Distt. Raebareli
Subhash Vidyarthi
Himanshu Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
