Bail application under Sections 457, 380, 411 IPC after theft recovery implicating applicant through co-accused custodial statements. Applicant already on bail in nine of ten other cases; two co-accused granted bail. Court allowed bail with standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58116
Court No. - 19
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6936 of 2023
Applicant :- Rohit Srivastava Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Verma,Rajesh Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
disclosed in 9 of which he has been granted bail.
enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court.
[Subhash Vidyarthi, J.]
Order Date :- 27.8.2024 Ram.
Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant implicated via co-accused custodial confessions and named in no FIR should be released on bail for Sections 457/380/411 IPC offences.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit Srivastava
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
