Smt. Manau v. Civil Judge (J.D.) Sadar Dist. Pratapgarh and 9 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge review petition challenging the constitutionality of designating an Advocate in her 70th year as Civil Judge under the Advocates Enactment Act, 1960. The petitioner argued the tribunal is not domestic under CPC and violations of the Act persist.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58014
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3991 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Manau
Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D.) Sadar Dist. Pratapgarh And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manuvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
- ययाचचिकयाकरᮄᯚ कके चविदयान अधधिविकया शቦኍ मननुविकेन ् धसिሺह , रयाज्य सरकयार कके चविदयान स्थयायቦኍ अधधिविकया शቦኍ हकेमन्त कनुमयार पयाण्डकेय तथया चविपकቦኍ सिሺख्यया 3 गयवि सभया कके चविदयान ा अधधिविकया शቦኍ ममो० तयाधलिब खयान कमो कमो स न ुया तथया परयाविलिቦኍ कया अविलिमोकन चकयया।
- भयारतቦኍय सिሺचविधियान कके अननुच्छकेद 227 कके अिሺतगरत ्ቚस्तनुत इस ययाचचिकया दयारया ययाचचिकयाकरᮄᯚ नके धसचविलि जज (अविर खण्ड), सदर, ्ቚतयापगढ़ कके न्ययाययालिय मम लचबत ि दቦኍवियानቦኍ वियाद सिሺख्यया 2055 सन 2018 मम लचबत अिሺतररम चनषकेधियाजया ्ቚयाथरनया-पर तथया ि उपरमोक वियाद कके शቦኍ्ቈ चनस्तयारण कया चनदरश चदयके जयानके ककी ्ቚयाथरनया ककी हहै।
- ययाचचिकयाकरᮄᯚ नके उपरमोक वियाद विषर 2018 मम ्ቚस्तनुत चकयया थया, जब उसककी आयनु 70 विषर ककी थቦኍ। ययाचचिकया कके सयाथ सिሺलि्ሿ वियाद कके आदकेश -पर सके यह ्ቚतቦኍत हमोतया हहै चक अभቦኍ तक ययाचचिकयाकरᮄᯚ कके अिሺतररम चनषकेधियाजया ्ቚयाथरनया -पर पर स न ुवियाई नहीሻ हहई हहै तथया वियाद्ቚ स्तनुत चकयके जयानके कके 6 विषर पश्चियात भቦኍ अभቦኍ तक वियाद चबन्दनु भቦኍ नहीሻ बनके हह। इस बቦኍचि
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Civil Judge constituted under Section 3 of the Advocates Enactment Act, 1960, is a domestic tribunal within the meaning of Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Code, 2005, justifying review u
Whether the Advocate in her 70th year of service has proceeded in violation of Section 3.
Whether the Advocate has been progressively notified as required by the Advocates Enactment Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Manau
- respondent
Civil Judge (J.D.) Sadar Dist. Pratapgarh
- respondent
,
- respondent
9 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- /3991/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Subhash Vidyarthi
- Order 2 — this page · Subhash Vidyarthi
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ms. Annu Singh Vs State of U.P. through Additional Chief Secretary Department of Home and Anr.
Maha Shiv Shakti Siddhpeeth Trust,Lko. Thru. Treasurer Shyam Sundar Srivastava Vs Civil Judge (Senior Division) Malihabad, Lko. and 2 Others
Devraj Verma Vs Principal Judge Family Court,Shravasti and Another
Rajan Maurya vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko.