Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence of the applicant and no request for adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15560 of 2021
Applicant :- Rasool Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Mishra,Gyanendra Pratap Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present on behalf of the applicant to press this application nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 4.4.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rasool Ahmad
State Of U.P.
Rajnish Kumar
Haseenuddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
