Anirudh Singh v. State of U P and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The present one-line order dismisses the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent even in the revised call.
The present one-line order dismisses the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent even in the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43343 of 2018
Petitioner :- Anirudh Singh Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Piyush Tripathi
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
None present for the petitioner even in revised call.
Sri Piyush Tripathi is present for the respondent.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 12.1.2023 Bhaskar
(Vikram D. Chauhan, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anirudh Singh
State Of U P
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court