M/S Arunica Cement Company and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37897 of 2022…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37897 of 2022…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37897 of 2022
Petitioner :- M/S Arunica Cement Company And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vindhya Vashini Prasad Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
After making brief submissions, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed.
Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation has no objection to the same.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Vikram D. Chauhan, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 11.1.2023 SL
Digitally signed by :- SHYAM LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S Arunica Cement Company
And Another
State Of U.P.
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court